Test scores are
not a good measure of the
value of an individual or of an education.
In a speech
on January 14th, Arne Duncan praised Korean parents and the Korean educational
system for producing strong test results and high college completion
rates. He qualified his statements by
stating, "I'm not saying we should be just like South Korea." Referencing Amanda Ripley, he pointed at
Korean students who are so sleep deprived that they are driven to wear napping
pillows on their wrists in schools. He
says there should be a "sense of balance and common sense."
I find no
balance in his words. Why should the
United States of America mimic South Korea's educational system? If we do, it's time to change our
paradigm. Why should we ram a square peg
into a round hole? American success has
traditionally been built by individualism and creative thought going hand in
hand. In the Korean system, the emphasis
is on rote memorization and cramming for
examination hell. Students rarely have
the opportunity to ask questions and hundreds of thousands emigrate to learn in
less rigid systems like the U.S. of A.
It sadly
seems we have already come a long way towards mimicking the nondemocratic aspects
of education in South Korea. South
Korea's Ministry of Education took power from local-school boards and concentrated
it in its own hands. After 1973,
school-board members needed to be approved by the minister of education. In N.Y., under Mayor Bloomberg, the
nondemocratic aspects became blaringly apparent following the Monday Night
Massacre with the P.E.P. (Panel for Educational Policy). Then, there is Michelle Rhee who stated as D.C.
chancellor, "I'm not running this district by consensus or committee. We're not running this school district
through the democratic process." Most recently, in Newark five principals were
suspended by state-appointed superintendent Cami Anderson for exercising what
one would assume to be their rights to free speech. They spoke against school closings. America has been a beacon of democracy and
public education is its foundation. In
order for a democracy to work, individuals need to be educated. Now, ironically, there is little democracy
left in education.
In South
Korea, parents go to huge extremes to ensure that their children's heads are
crammed full of the kind of facts that will help them score high on tests,
enter a top university and obtain a high position. The costs of these private cramming academies,
or HAGWONS, are high, both monetarily and psychologically. Some families are driven into debt. They are prohibitively expensive for the
poorer classes. Ironically, many
students end up studying late at private
cram schools and then sleeping through school during the day. Hence, the need for wrist pillows. Does Duncan believe that American children
should attend school for fifteen hours?
Should American students focus on cramming for tests at any price? Should we dispose of hopes for well-rounded
individuals, free to pursue their own paths of learning? Does Duncan want a two-tier system in which wealthier
parents obtain phenomenal tutors after hours, poor kids have none, and no one
really wins while the test scores sure look great!
In South Korea,
the situation became distorted. A curfew
was placed upon study hours given that students were staying up until 1 or 2
a.m. Now, legally, students cannot study
past 10 p.m. at the hagwons. Still, some
continue illegally underground and, in at least one instance, on a
rooftop. Saturday classes were outlawed,
but apparently many still attend, albeit illegally, to give their children an
advantage to make it to the best universities in a very high-pressured
system.
South Korean
children lose many of the pleasures of childhood. Youth suicide rates in Korea are very high
and most sources point towards the stress engendered by the academic system. Why would we want to replicate this system,
or anything like it?
Many
students graduate from schools in South Korea with skills, yet there are no
jobs waiting for them. Instead of the bashing
American schools and trying to destroy the lives of generations of kids with
some demented idea of reform, why don't we focus more on raising children with
diverse talents and diverse interests while simultaneously creating more jobs
that support a comfortable middle-class lifestyle?
No comments:
Post a Comment